email page contents print page contents

Bibliography

0 wallclock secs ( 0.10 usr + 0.00 sys = 0.10 CPU) 9 hits


Dissuasion Strategy
Press Release (PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich and Robert Martinage

05/06/2008
alliances, china, competitive/grand strategies, dod strategy and policy


Dissuasion Strategy
Report (PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich and Robert Martinage

The report dissects the concept of dissuasion; highlights its differences with deterrence; offers insight on how it can be operationalized; and solutions for overcoming possible impediments.

05/06/2008
alliances, china, competitive/grand strategies, dod strategy and policy


A Cooperative Strategy for the 21st Century Seapower
Backgrounder (PDF file - opens in new window)
By Robert Work and Jan van Tol

The backgrounder offers a general assessment of A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower, highlighting its nature,origins, strengths and weaknesses.

03/26/2008
alliances, competitive/grand strategies, dod strategy and policy, navy, service-focused analysis


A New Global Defense Posture for the Second Transoceanic Era
Report (PDF file - opens in new window)
By Robert Work, Andrew Krepinevich

Whenever the nation contemplates making a major shift in its global defense posture, planned changes should be seriously and broadly debated, because these changes will shape and constrain US strategic options for some time. While the broad outlines for the ongoing shift in the US defense posture appear to be headed in the right direction, the changes have generally been made without much public or even internal governmental debate. Several important questions remain to be fully answered, and further changes will likely be required to address several existing or looming 21st century strategic challenges.

04/20/2007
alliances, competitive/grand strategies, navy, transformation strategy


The Future of U.S. Ground Forces: Challenges and Requirements
Testimony (PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich

Testimony before the Unites States Senate Committee on Armed Services

04/17/2007
afghanistan, alliances, army, congressional action, cost of defense-overview, cost of military operations, critical technologies, iraq, military operations, personnel and readiness, qdr 2005, select weapons systems, service budgets, systems/force structure


The Quadrennial Defense Review: Rethinking the US Military Posture
Report (PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich

An anlysis of the $441.8 billion request for national defense authority for fiscal year 2006, not including funds for Iraq and Afghanistan.

10/24/2005
alliances, competitive/grand strategies, dod strategy and policy, homeland security, qdr, qdr 2005, china, proliferation, radical islamism


The Revolution in War
Report (PDF file - opens in new window)
By Michael Vickers & Robert Martinage

Michael Vickers and Robert Martinage offer an insight of a decade-long assessment on the changing nature of conflict and the Revolution in Military Affairs.

12/01/2004
alliances, competitive/grand strategies, dod strategy and policy, military operations, revolution in military affairs, transformation strategy


Transforming America‘s Alliances
Report By Andrew Krepinevich

If the United States hopes to preserve its vital security interests at home and abroad beyond the near term, it will almost certainly find itself relying more on allies than it does at present.

02/00/2000
alliances, alliance structure, military alliances, transformation


The Conflict Environment of 2016: A Scenario-Based Approach
Report (PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich

A look at different modernization and purchase plans for the Air Force

10/01/1996
alliances, competitive/grand strategies, scenarios


Alliances

The long-term challenges facing the United States and its allies will likely be far more formidable than those they confront today.  If the United States is to preserve favorable military balances in key regions around the globe, it will find itself increasingly dependent upon allies for support.  This may lead to a somewhat different alliance structure than currently exists.  However, it will almost certainly require a very different division of labor among the United States and its allies.  Restructuring alliance relationships to meet these requirements will take years, perhaps a decade or more, to accomplish.