email page contents print page contents

Bibliography

1 wallclock secs ( 0.19 usr + 0.03 sys = 0.22 CPU) 20 hits


Estimating Funding for Afghanistan
Update
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Todd Harrison

12/01/2009
adb (year), afghanistan, annual defense budget, army, cost of military operations, military operations, service budgets, tables and graphs, usmc

The deployment of additional troops to Afghanistan over the coming months will require additional funding in Fiscal Year 2010 (FY10). It is difficult to precisely estimate the cost that will be incurred by the deployment due to a variety of factors including the composition of the forces deployed and the specific mission they are given. The adversary also has a say in determining the operational tempo of our forces, and thus the costs incurred in terms of such items as fuel, ammunition, and equipment. Still, historical trends in the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan can provide a useful guide for making such an estimate.


The War in Afghanistan in Strategic Context
Testimony
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich

11/17/2009
afghanistan, army, competitive/grand strategies, iraq, radical islamism, SLH

prepared statement for testimony before U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation


Resourcing a Full Spectrum Army
Slides
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Todd Harrison

08/31/2009
annual defense budget, army, cost of defense-overview, service-focused analysis, systems/force structure

Presentation slides from August 28, 2009 Symposium on G-8 Future of the Army


Life After FCS
Backgrounder
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Evan Montgomery

08/26/2009
army, critical technologies, select weapons systems, service-focused analysis, systems/force structure

This backgrounder offers some preliminary observations on the likely characteristics of the new program, and raises several questions that the Army will have to address as it goes forward.


Impact of the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan on the US Military’s Plans, Programs, and Budgets
Report
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Todd Harrison

08/12/2009
afghanistan, army, cost of military operations, iraq, military operations, personnel and readiness, select weapons systems, service-focused analysis, SLH, systems/force structure

This report assesses the effect that the operations in these two theaters have had on the plans, programs, and budgets of the US military, specifically those of the US Army. It makes projections for the future costs of the operations in these two theaters.


Correcting Course: The Cancellation of the FCS Program
Backgrounder
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich and Evan Montgomery

07/30/2009
army, critical technologies, select weapons systems, service-focused analysis, systems/force structure

A look at the Future Combat Systems and Secretary Gates' recent decision to cancel the program


The Future of U.S. Ground Forces
Testimony
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich

03/26/2009
army, china, dod strategy and policy, military operations, personnel and readiness, service-focused analysis, SLH

Testimony Before the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee Airland Subcommittee


An Army at Crossroads
Slides
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich

11/18/2008
army, china, dod strategy and policy, military operations, personnel and readiness, service-focused analysis, SLH

Presentation slides from Reorienting US Military Services Conference


An Army At The Crossroads
Report
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich

11/17/2008
army, china, dod strategy and policy, military operations, personnel and readiness, service-focused analysis, SLH

The report makes recommendations on achieving a more balanced force—one that is not only balanced between the demands of irregular and conventional operations, but also one that is more evenly weighted between the Active and Reserve Components.


U.S. Strategy in Iraq: A Third Way Alternative
Testimony
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich

01/23/2008
army, dod strategy and policy, iraq, military operations

Prepared remarks for the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation hearing


Of IEDs and MRAPs
Slides
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich and Dakota Wood

10/17/2007
afghanistan, army, defense industry, iraq, military operations, personnel and readiness, select weapons systems, systems/force structure, usmc

Presentation Slides from Congressional Briefing


CSBA Questions DoD's Substantial Investment in MRAP
Press Release
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Natalya Anfilofyeva

10/17/2007
army, critical technologies, defense industry, iraq, military operations, personnel and readiness, select weapons systems, systems/force structure, usmc

The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments today released Of IEDs and MRAPs: Force Protection in Complex Irregular Operations, by Andrew F. Krepinevich, President, and Dakota L. Wood, Senior Fellow. This analysis reviews the current effort by the Defense Department to acquire and field thousands of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) class vehicles, and to do so on a crash program basis, in support of US forces in Iraq.


Of IEDs and MRAPs: Force Protection in Complex Irregular Operations
Report
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich and Dakota Wood

10/17/2007
afghanistan, army, defense industry, iraq, military operations, personnel and readiness, select weapons systems, systems/force structure, usmc

Political and military leaders are currently grappling with the question of how much to invest in a new system of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected armored vehicles without undermining the ability of the force to conduct the current mission, or its effectiveness across the range of missions and operating environments in the years ahead. This paper’s purpose is to ensure that the issues relevant to arriving at a good decision are given proper consideration.


The Future of U.S. Ground Forces: Challenges and Requirements
Testimony
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich

04/17/2007
afghanistan, alliances, army, congressional action, cost of defense-overview, cost of military operations, critical technologies, iraq, military operations, personnel and readiness, qdr 2005, select weapons systems, service budgets, systems/force structure

Testimony before the Unites States Senate Committee on Armed Services


New Counterinsurgency Doctrine and Baghdad Surge
Slides
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Andrew Krepinevich

02/28/2007
army, competitive/grand strategies, dod strategy and policy, iraq,military operations, personnel and readiness, service-focused analysis

Presentation slides from Future Defense Planning Needs Seminar for Senior Congressional Staff


Forging the Sword: Unit Manning in the US Army
Report
(PDF file - opens in new window)
By Pat Towell

09/01/2004
army, dod strategy and policy, personnel and readiness, service-focused analysis, systems/force structure

Pat Towell analyzes Army plans for unit manning. Will it improve combat effectives and training?


Pentagon Takes Major Step Toward Military Transformation
Press Release
By Alise Frye

05/08/2002
Crusader, Defense, Pentagon, Army

Cutting the Crusader is the best example yet of DoD's commitment to creating tomorrow's military.


W(h)ither the Army?
Highlight
By Andrew Krepinevich

01/18/2000
Transformation, US Army, army modernization, Shinseki, Army After Next, Force XXI

Analysis of the Army's modernization plans


The Future of Land Forces
Highlight
By Michael Vickers

04/21/1999
Army, future land forces, transformation, RMA

An analysis of the future composition of land forces


RMA and the Future of Land Forces: Era of Tank Primacy is Over
Press Release
By Stacey Shepard

04/20/1999
RMA, Revolution in Military Affairs, land forces, Army, military transformation

Press release on CSBA's predictions for the future of land forces


Army

Throughout the twentieth century, the United States Army was oriented primarily
on waging conventional warfare against a similarly armed great power, first the
German Army during the World Wars and later the Soviet Army during the Cold War.
Likewise, the pre-9/11 Army was designed to fight short, conventional wars against
regional powers along the lines of what it experienced during Operation Desert Storm in 1991. Today, however, nearly a half million American soldiers are serving overseas in some eighty countries around the world. Over 2,200 soldiers have been killed in combat operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and over 17,000 wounded. The garrison Army that fired nary a shot in Central Europe for half a century during the Cold War has, in the first decade of the new century, become a battle-hardened, expeditionary force conducting protracted ground campaigns on two main fronts. Yet for all the change the Army has experienced, more is on the way.

To date, the Army has made or is in the process of making a number of changes designed to help it address these challenges: reorganizing from a division-based Army to a modular, brigade-based force; rebalancing the force by placing an increased emphasis on military police, military intelligence, civil affairs and other capability areas while decreasing its emphasis on artillery, air defense, and armor units; increasing the size of its Special Operations Forces; updating its doctrine for counterinsurgency and stability operations; and modifying its training facilities to better prepare soldiers for the types of operations they have been tasked to conduct in Iraq and Afghanistan.

While these initiatives are certainly valuable, more must be done to prepare the
Army for the types of threats it will likely face in the near future. Specifically, the
Army finds itself in an era of persistent irregular warfare, in which the United States
seeks, wherever possible, to pursue an indirect approach to dealing with its enemies
by building up the forces of threatened states as a first line of defense, emphasizing
preventive steady-state “Phase 0” operations whenever possible. Should this approach fail, the Army must also retain the ability to “surge” forces and to take the lead in carrying out large-scale stability operations when necessary. At the same time, the Army must remain capable of conducting traditional power-projection operations, to include regime change operations against minor nuclear-armed states such as North Korea and Iran (prospectively), and securing nuclear weapons no longer under the effective control of a failing or failed state. An Army that can successfully conduct these missions will likely possess the forces and skill sets relevant for accomplishing other missions along the conflict spectrum.