
Bibliography
Service Budgets
0 wallclock secs ( 0.12 usr + 0.00 sys = 0.12 CPU) 7 hits
Military Readiness: Cost Effectiveness of U.S. Plans for Reset, Force Expansion and Weapons Modernization
Testimony
(PDF file - opens in new window) By Steven Kosiak
Prepared statement by CSBA Vice President for Budget Studies Steven Kosiak for the House Armed Services Committee hearing on Military Readiness: Cost-Effectiveness of US Plans for Reset, Force Expansion and Weapons Modernization.
02/14/2008 congressional action, cost of defense-overview, cost of military operations, critical technologies, defense budget topline, dod strategy and policy, federal budget, service budgets
U.S. Fixed-Wing Modernization Plans: Near Term Choices
Slides
(PDF file - opens in new window) By Steven Kosiak and Barry Watts
Presentation slides from congressional briefing
09/19/2007 air force, annual defense budget, critical technologies, select weapons systems, service budgets, systems/force structure
The Unmanned Combat Air System Carrier Demonstration Program: A New Dawn for Naval Aviation?
Slides
(PDF file - opens in new window) By Robert Work and Thomas Ehrhard
Presentation Slides from Congressional Briefing co-sponsored by Senator Dorgan
07/11/2007 air force, annual defense budget, congressional action, critical technologies, navy, select weapons systems, service budgets, systems/force structure
U.S. Fighter Modernization Plans: Near-Term Choices
Report
(PDF file - opens in new window) By Steven Kosiak and Barry Watts
Under current plans, the US military will spend over $300 billion on fighter modernization over the next several decades, primarily for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program. This is far more than is projected to be spent on any other major acquisition program. Barry Watts and Steven Kosiak, the authors of the report discuss military requirements for US airpower and the affordability of existing plans.
06/20/2007 air force, competitive/grand strategies, critical technologies, dod strategy and policy, select weapons systems, service budgets, service-focused analysis, systems/force structure
A New Transformation Plan for the Navy's Surface Battle Line
Report
(PDF file - opens in new window) By Robert Work
This report is an expansion of a Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments Backgrounder entitled Know When to Hold ’Em: Modernizing the Navy’s Surface Battle Line, dated September 20, 2006. It provides a broader, historical-based analysis of the Navy’s current plans to modernize and recapitalize its fleet of guided-missile cruisers, guided-missile destroyers, and general-purpose destroyers, and proposes a different transformation approach than the one now being pursued.
04/19/2007 navy, service budgets, service-focused analysis, systems/force structure, transformation strategy
The Future of U.S. Ground Forces: Challenges and Requirements
Testimony
(PDF file - opens in new window) By Andrew Krepinevich
Testimony before the Unites States Senate Committee on Armed Services
04/17/2007 afghanistan, alliances, army, congressional action, cost of defense-overview, cost of military operations, critical technologies, iraq, military operations, personnel and readiness, qdr 2005, select weapons systems, service budgets, systems/force structure
Matching Resources With Requirements: Options for Modernizing the US Air Force
Report
(PDF file - opens in new window) By Steven Kosiak
Can the Air Force afford its modernization plan? Steven Kosiak finds it unlikely and provides four alternate models for maintaining air superiority.
08/01/2004 air force, competitive/grand strategies, critical technologies, dod strategy and policy, revolution in military affairs, select weapons systems, service budgets, service-focused analysis, systems/force structure, transformation strategy
Service Focused Analysis
1 wallclock secs ( 0.16 usr + 0.01 sys = 0.17 CPU) 0 hits
|
Tables and Graphs
Department of Defense Budget by Service
(budget authority in billions of dollars)
| |
Army |
Navy |
Air Force |
Defense Wide |
|
Current $ |
FY 2008 $ |
% of total |
Current $ |
FY 2008 $ |
% of total |
Current $ |
FY 2008 $ |
% of total |
Current $ |
FY 2008 $ |
% of total |
| 1980 |
34.4 |
89 |
24% |
47.2 |
122.3 |
34% |
41.7 |
108.1 |
30% |
17.3 |
44.9 |
12% |
| 1985 |
74.3 |
139.3 |
26% |
99 |
185.8 |
35% |
99.4 |
186.5 |
35% |
14.1 |
26.5 |
5% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1990 |
78.5 |
127.1 |
27% |
100 |
161.9 |
34% |
92.9 |
150.4 |
32% |
21.7 |
35.1 |
7% |
| 1991 |
91.8 |
143.3 |
29% |
103.5 |
161.4 |
32% |
91.3 |
142.4 |
29% |
32.8 |
51.2 |
10% |
| 1992 |
73.6 |
111.8 |
26% |
90.3 |
137.2 |
31% |
82.3 |
125.1 |
29% |
40.8 |
62 |
14% |
| 1993 |
64.8 |
96.7 |
24% |
83.2 |
124.1 |
31% |
79.1 |
118.1 |
30% |
40 |
59.7 |
15% |
| 1994 |
62.4 |
91.2 |
25% |
78.1 |
114.1 |
31% |
74.6 |
109 |
30% |
36.3 |
53 |
14% |
| 1995 |
63.3 |
90.6 |
25% |
76.9 |
110.1 |
30% |
73.9 |
105.8 |
29% |
41.6 |
59.5 |
16% |
| 1996 |
64.5 |
90.4 |
25% |
80.1 |
112.2 |
31% |
73 |
102.2 |
29% |
36.9 |
51.8 |
15% |
| 1997 |
64.4 |
88.2 |
25% |
79.6 |
108.9 |
31% |
73.2 |
100.2 |
28% |
40.8 |
55.9 |
16% |
| 1998 |
64 |
85.5 |
25% |
80.7 |
107.7 |
31% |
76.3 |
101.8 |
30% |
37.6 |
50.1 |
15% |
| 1999 |
68.4 |
89 |
25% |
84 |
109.3 |
30% |
81.9 |
106.6 |
29% |
44.3 |
57.6 |
16% |
| 2000 |
73.2 |
92.8 |
25% |
88.8 |
112.7 |
31% |
83.1 |
105.4 |
29% |
45.52 |
57.8 |
16% |
| 2001 |
77 |
94.9 |
25% |
95.5 |
117.6 |
31% |
89.5 |
110.3 |
29% |
47.9 |
59 |
15% |
| 2002 |
85.9 |
103.1 |
25% |
102.4 |
122.9 |
30% |
100.2 |
120.3 |
29% |
57.1 |
68.6 |
17% |
| 2003 |
121.1 |
141.2 |
28% |
124.1 |
144.6 |
28% |
125.2 |
146 |
29% |
67.4 |
78.5 |
15% |
| 2004 |
153.1 |
172.9 |
33% |
124.3 |
140.4 |
26% |
125.5 |
141.8 |
27% |
68.1 |
76.9 |
14% |
| 2005 |
152.8 |
167 |
32% |
131.7 |
143.9 |
27% |
127.9 |
139.8 |
26% |
71.5 |
78.1 |
15% |
| 2006 |
174.9 |
184.2 |
33% |
143.8 |
151.4 |
27% |
141.7 |
149.2 |
26% |
76.1 |
80.1 |
14% |
| 2007 |
155.1 |
155.1 |
31% |
136.7 |
136.7 |
27% |
134.1 |
134.1 |
26% |
81.1 |
81.1 |
16% |
| 2008 |
128.4 |
128.4 |
27% |
139.5 |
139.5 |
29% |
136.4 |
136.4 |
28% |
78.9 |
78.9 |
16% |
| 2009 |
139.1 |
135.6 |
27% |
147.4 |
143.7 |
29% |
142.6 |
139 |
28% |
83.9 |
81.8 |
16% |
| 2010 |
142.2 |
135.3 |
27% |
152.6 |
145.2 |
29% |
144.4 |
137.3 |
28% |
84.3 |
80.2 |
16% |
| 2011 |
141.3 |
131.1 |
27% |
155.8 |
144.6 |
29% |
147.5 |
136.9 |
28% |
85 |
78.9 |
16% |
| 2012 |
142.72 |
129.3 |
27% |
158.1 |
143.2 |
29% |
150.2 |
136.1 |
28% |
87.4 |
79.2 |
16% |
| 2013 |
142.6 |
126 |
26% |
160.2 |
141.5 |
29% |
152.2 |
134.5 |
28% |
93.6 |
82.7 |
17% |
Source: CSBA, June 2007. Based on DoD data.
FY 2007 figures exclude GWOT supplemental appropriations.
Figures for FY 2008 and future years exclude all GWOT funding.
Archive
Department of Defense Budget by Service (2002)
|