The Transformation of Strategic-Strike Operations


Strategic Studies Strategy for the Long Haul [Flash slide show] Future Warfare > Alliances Competitive/Grand Strategies Scenarios Transformation Strategy Revolution in Military Affairs Service-Focused Analysis > Army Navy Air Force Marines DOD Strategy and Policy > QDR Rumsfeld Strategy Review US Commission on National Security National Defense Panel Comission on Roles and Missions Bottom-Up Review Radical Islamism China Proliferation Defense Budget Studies Overview [Flash slide show] Strategy for the Long Haul [Flash slide show] Annual Defense Budget Cost of Defense Plans and Forces> Overview Systems and Force Structure Personnel and Readiness Nuclear Forces Tables and Graphs > Budget Topline Budget By Title Weapons Systems Budgets Service Budgets Federal Budget Cost of Military Operations > Iraq Costs Afghanistan Costs Other Operations Costs Defense Budget Process > Defense Budget Process Congressional Budget Resolution Defense Authorization Defense Appropriations National Defense Components Homeland Security Publications Publications List Publications Orders Subscription Service Subscription Service Orders Events and Activities Congressional Programs> Forums Testimonies Briefings and Presentations Strategic Studies Exercises CSBA in the News Press Releases Subscribe to CSBA News About Us Mission Statement President’s Message Staff Directory Board of Directors Employment Opportunities CSBA in the News Contact Us

The Transformation of Strategic-Strike Operations

Andrew Krepinevich and Robert Martinage	Published 01/11/2002 Press Release

Contact: Lena Buck		PHONE: (202) 331-7990
January 11, 2002		FAX: (202) 331-8019

CSBA’s report on the Transformation of Strategic-Strike Operations, first released in March of last year, recommended that the Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) consider the merits of a new type of strategic triad. This new triad was composed of long-range precision-strike forces, electronic-strike capabilities, and a smaller, but modernized nuclear force comprising between 1,500-3,000 highly survivable warheads. The findings of the NPR released this week track closely with CSBA’s recommendation.¹ According to CSBA authors, Andrew Krepinevich and Robert Martinage, “The administration’s plan to reduce significantly our reliance on nuclear weapons by initiating a transformation of our strategic strike force represents a positive step toward preparing our military to meet the challenges of a new era.”

Co-chaired by the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy, the congressionally mandated NPR provides a roadmap for how U.S. nuclear forces will be sized and shaped over the next 5-10 years. Building upon the 2001 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) and responding to important changes in the security environment since the last review was completed in 1994, the 2002 NPR made many ground-breaking decisions, including:

Reducing the number of operationally deployed U.S. nuclear warheads from over 6,000 to approximately 3,800 by Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 and to 1,700-2,000 by FY 2012; and

Establishing a “New Triad” comprising nuclear and non-nuclear strategic strike capabilities, active and passive missile defenses, and a responsive defense infrastructure for developing, building, and maintaining offensive forces and defensive systems.

The explicit incorporation of non-nuclear strike capabilities into U.S. strategic forces marks an important shift in U.S. policy. As Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld commented, “The addition of non-nuclear strike forces – including conventional strike and information operations – means that the U.S. will be less dependent than it has been in the past on nuclear forces to provide its offensive deterrent capability.”

Click here for the executive summary, or contact CSBA to purchase a copy of the monograph.

END

A briefing on the “Findings of the Nuclear Posture Review” and a transcript from the DoD/DoE special briefing on the NPR held on January 9, 2002 is available at [http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jan2002/t01092002_t0109npr.html].